This is one of the last images that I made with a large format camera before I left living in Sturt St in Adelaide's CBD to move down to Encounter Bay on the coast on the coast of the southern Fleurieu Peninsula. The photo was made early on a Sunday morning in the late autumn. Hence the empty streets.
It is of Wakefield House in Wakefield Street just east of Victoria Square. I do not think that it is heritage listed. Wakefield House is a heavy, concrete modernist building that would have had a utopian feel to it when it was first built and celebrated. This building represents the future. It stood for modern, industrial Adelaide. Today, my personal impressions is that the building has a historical almost brutal look.
There is a long history of architectural photography and this one is a modest architectural photo in a documentary style rather than an atmospheric moment. It does not strive to be the glossy architectural photo that one sees in the architectural magazines. It makes no pretension to be an architectural hero shot, namely the photo that gives a project an identity through being the face of a building.The hero shot is the image in commercial architectural photography done for the client that everyone goes ooh aah over.
Photography is now dominant in the making, promotion and experience of architecture. photography is principal medium through which architecture is experienced is .The photos of architectural photography are designed to show us idealised spaces . This photography acts as a publicist and it is am form of marketing. This approach acts to exclude the documentary approach of say Eugène Atget in Paris or Berenice Abbott in New York.
This photogenic architectural photography is idealised in the sense that architecture is usually photographed and presented under certain conditions:
1) perfect weather, i.e. blue skies, or alternatively:
2) at night or dawn,
3) no trace of usage,
4) no people to be seen.
This is an architecture that is removed from everyday life and treated in terms of the purity of the form. There are no weeds or distracting objects in these photos.
The experience of architecture is now inseparable from the experience of its imagery, and as photography increasingly belongs to the very same networks of spectacle, then an independent and critical photography of architecture becomes endangered.